More like I'm wondering what will result from using just the mix and water, or maybe the mix with water and eggs but no oil. ...bound to be tasty either way. o_o

Indeed, can't really mess it up, it is brownie mix.

Exactly! I don't give two and a half damns what the texture's like. Brownie mix is brownie mix and I'd just as gladly eat it without cooking it at all.

Indeed,

and who doesn't like chocolaty things.

Crazy people. >8[

GONNA MAKE BROWNIE MIX WHICH MAY OR MAY NOT COME OUT AS EITHER GOO OR DUST OR SOMETHING WHEN IT'S DONE

yayyyyyyyy *muppet flail*

Might not taste is if it comes out as dust, I hate dry brownies.

I don't think the taste will be affected... Either way, in twenty-ish minutes, we may have something resembling brownies!

Y...yay sort of....

IT WILL STILL TASTE LIKE CHOCOLATE DAMMIT. DO NOT BE RACIST.

If it's dry and dusty it's disgusting!

NOT IF IT'S CHOCOLATEY AND DERICIOUS IT'S NOT.

Doesn't look dusty at all. o w o

Well dry brownies are gross because dry food is yucky.

I don't generally mind it; it's just not as good,.

But these are not dry. they are dericious.

indeed, I kinda want a dessert now.

Cooomeeee to meeeeee. We could eat brownies. Or if you didn't want them, you could eat the toaster strudels.

Brownies it is...

If I don't eat them all. 8D They have a lovely texture. Kinda... springy, but not really cake-like.

Indeeeeed, that sounds good.

You should try making brownies without the oil sometime. I just used twice the amount of water it said and one egg, and they turned out fine IMO. Didn't stick, didn't get gloppy, just nice spongy brownies.

Indeed, usually if I take out the oil I add a little milk and an extra egg. Makes them super fluffy.

Well, these arent' fluffy... but I didn't want them to be, or else I'd have added another egg. They are pretty much my favorite texture for a brownie.

indeed, I do kinda prefer my brownies a bit more fudgelike.

Roo.

Alright enough about brownies before I end up eating more. >8I SO DELICIOUS.

What shall we do with Russel?

Russel, well we should have him and Saya do something together so we can develop them both.

Yes, yes, we should! ...I'm thinking random silly moment, like that time the Rake showed up in the house. Maybe it's just because we watched the Dracular movie, but I totally want to see how they handle something "scary".

Indeed! They should totally run into a ghost of some kind.

Well, they do live in magical voodoo territory. Suppose Warren finds some artifact or some such one day and brings it home, and it happens to be haunted...

indeed! Perfect.

Roo, found out that Mama is supposed to have Downs Syndrome, she's way to tall for it though.

Figured it was something along those lines...

indeed,

but yes, my friend watched it and said that Mama was evil but I really don't think that's the case, everything she did was based around being with her "Children" and protecting them, she wasn't what I'd call evil.

No. Far from friendly, but when you're purely emotion like that, what do you expect?

indeed, and even as a ghost she isn't evil because evil, once she has her "baby" she's good to go.

Eeyup. It's not like she just goes around killing people for no reason other than to drink the tears of their loved ones and laugh at their misery or whatever...

No, in fact her kill count is pretty low for a ghost in a horror movie.

Indeed. Much more like a protective animal-parent than an evil ghost.

yup, somehow that's scarier. More believable.

Exactly. ...tbh, "evil for the sake of being evil" is not very believable at all and tends to take a lot out of a story. I guess some people find the lack of motivation scary, but it just seems implausible to me.

indeed, but when your ghost has back story and fairly realistic motivation it seems more...real.

Yes it does. And the more realistic the feeling behind it, the more believable it is, and thus the more scary.

Exactly,

and I should be going to bed now, goodnight willis.