*lurks about and sets out a tray of brownies* :3

oxo *eyes them hungerly but suspiciously* ono

*chuckles mischievously and drinks kool-aid*

*yawns*... I'll eat one tomorrow.. maybe bed time for the dk xD

I hope you don't mean to try to recruit me.

BD I want to be a ranger! o3o especially if it means following DK.

We could make our own side, espy. It'd be fun to have the nuetral side

xD I honestly thought that Espy had a group like that.

I'm not so much as neutral, as, say...double-sided. Two-faced, without the negative connotations, in a way.

...Well, I'm sure to the certain sides, there're always the bad meanings, eh. -smirk-

I do. It's in my siggy, collecting dust.

XD I am not patient enough to learn the ways of the ninja... I fall out of trees @.@

...I think I actually remember that. What was it, jumping out of a tree until you learn to fly, and hoping you don't break a leg in the process?

You know, haystacks are always handy. -AC reference-

EDIT: Or...you know. ...Wheelbarrows of geraniums.

XD Espy I prefer cardboard boxes. ....!

Regardless, having two sides feels odd. I want to talk with cron and DK about making a third side, just for kicks.

But they don't break his fall. Also, I think there's a random completely anachronistic cardboard box in AC2 that can be seen in a cut scene.

@funk: Triangles are always stronger then a strait line, though truthfully alot of users are neutral and do this kind of thing for fun. Besides there is a 3rd group, the dragon one.

@Espy: -watches mgs reference fly over espy head-

I know it's an mgs ref XD

The dragon side? Espy, do explain this

Linkie mc Link, link la link:

http://trisphee.com/forums/showthread.php?t=5851

Wasn't there a Dragon group some time ago...

There was also the Gray/Grey.

EDIT: ...ninja'd.

Yes, but is this the third side of the game? I do not suppose so...

Funk you would have to talk to Cron and Dk. My guess is that if you wish to stay neutral you would away from either side. XD there is no rule that says you can not start one but rp wise if you wish for it to be in the cannon they are the ones you have to talk to.

I've talked to DK; she says she needs Cronis's permission, but he's not answering my question x___X;

I see. Were the nuetral side to be established, I suppose you would be the leader, and I a vice, or lower.

Or we could co-op. -shrug-

XD so would you two be truly neutral or mercenaries for hire?

I'd pretty much be running around causing havoc...and causing painless death only to those who deserve it. -never kills needlessly-

...or, you know, needlessly without pay.

yes but who are you to judge those who deserve it. XD in my mind casting that judgement is not neutral, it is choosing. Ergo taking a side. :P

Those who deserve it as in, people who do kill just for the heck of killing.

-wonders if that even made sense outside Espy's own warped brain-

I thought we would just kill both becuase we could.

Nah, hindering progress is fun enough. -wires up an uncovered paint bucket over the door-

XD but espy... that makes you a good guy, because good guys do not kill needlessly.

I vote for funks answer.

...And bad guys do? (Well, okay, if someone's charging at me, I'll stab them. To death. ...-grin-)

Poggio, will you join us in this endevor if you could? Or will you join the rangers?

Tis the nature of good and evil if I understand it correctly. Evil is anything that knowingly goes against nature. Nature, right= Good. It is why biting in the fruit of knowledge was so bad. It goes against nature. ... that is a bad example. It is like a thief that knowingly steals. That is bad. not necessarily evil but I am not good at evil.

Edit: Funk I am looking to be a ranger. It what I wanted since I joined after open beta. Then all the spots were full. When hermes did it, I was a knight.

How about a thief who knowingly steals because he needs to survive?

Or perhaps the nature that is violent becuase of this? There is an honor in champions battling before a fight becuase they can. Sometimes it settles the fight. Sometimes it does not. This is nature. However, the extermanist nature of those who think "All evil" or "All good" is what is truly bad, so we kill both sides becuase they are "enemies" or threats to the being. They do not have to be us, but becuase they are the enemy, there is honor in killing them.

See that is one of the grey area's my friend didn't explain to me. Like I asked her about people who had been brain washed into killing because they thought it was the right thing. I didn't really get a straight answer. xD

They exterminate, and see the enemy as "not human" because they are brain-washed. This is bad. The humanization of the enemy because "enemy" would be defined as a subset of "human" is good, in a meta-ethical sense.

Funk... you guys sound like borgs or robots or that 1984 MAC commercial.