Log In

Of course, that is not to say we aren't having a chat...

Allow me to rephrase:

There is no continuous conversation in this thread. Interruptions and random interjections prevent it.

I can tell

It's okay moon no will really get any of this unless you all live in the same house as us.

This is what happens when you don't fucking read what is going on.

However, I can make the argument to say that without the continuous flow of headway in a particular direction, there can be no conversation. Therefore, this is simply banter!!

Conversations may be held. But are rarely obtainable

We are currently having a conversation about whether or not conversations can exist here.

I like pie!

Conversations are easily broken

Tch, fine I concede to that red truth... Axion stands defeated at this juncture. However, refute this.. This is not a true conversation but a filibuster!!

I do like pie also.

It can happen from time to time.

Once more, my previous truth stands.

There is no continuous conversation in this thread. Interruptions and random interjections prevent it.

A filibuster is described as an incredibly long speech.

So this truth must be stated in red...

There are too many individuals involved for a filibuster to be present.

ahaha ahaha ahaha ahaha ahaha ahaha!!!!!! Problem jibber-jabberrrrrrr?

A filibuster can be preformed by multiple people, the republican part of the house has done chain filibusters in the past using multiple members.

This could be a filibuster.

However, a filibuster prevents a room from reaching a conclusion on a subject or matter. We are trying to reach a conclusion about conversations.

This is a filibuster.

I must say that, I feel like I would like come ice cream.

But one can hold conversation if one chooses to.

We have not engaged in tactics to obstruct a decision from being formed.

This is the purpose of a filibuster.

We have not stated what decision we are trying to reach.

A filibuster is not possible

Thus why I enjoy watching all this happen.